Fujifilm X-H2 vs X-T4: full comparison

The X-H2 pairs the 40.2 MP X-Trans V sensor with X-Processor 5; the X-T4 runs 26.1 MP X-Trans IV with X-Processor 4. Beyond the pixel count, the X-H2 gets AI subject detection — animals, birds, vehicles, all found without you telling the camera what to look for — while the X-T4 detects faces and eyes. The X-H2 also has a pixel-shift mode that stacks to 160 MP composites for static subjects on a tripod, which is a niche feature until the day you need it.

8K/30 with F-Log2 on the X-H2 against 4K/60 with F-Log on the X-T4, and the X-H2 takes CFexpress Type B in its first slot to feed the higher bitrates. If you are cutting in 4K and want crop room, or delivering anything above 4K, the X-H2 is the only one of the two in that conversation. The X-T4's fully articulating screen is still the better one for filming yourself.

The X-H2 is a 660g body with a deep grip, a top status LCD, a 5.76M-dot viewfinder, and PASM-style controls. The X-T4 is 607g with the classic Fuji dials and a 3.69M-dot finder. Both are weather-sealed, both run the NP-W235 battery (540 shots on the X-H2, 500 on the X-T4), and both shoot 15 fps mechanically. Which layout you prefer is not a small thing — people who love Fuji dials tend to dislike the X-H2's top plate on sight.

The X-T4 is discontinued and now a used buy at well under its 1,699 USD launch price, and it remains a strong stills camera with good video. The X-H2 launched at 1,999 USD, is still current, and is the one to buy if you want resolution, 8K, the better viewfinder, or the grip. For a stills shooter on a budget who likes dials, the X-T4 is still the smarter money.