Fujifilm X-M1 vs X-A1: full comparison
The X-M1 and X-A1 are closely matched — the right pick comes down to what you shoot.
Also searched as XM1 vs XA1, and in the other order as XA1 vs XM1.
Not sure which one fits? Take the Fujifilm camera quiz and we will score both bodies against your answers.
The short version
The Fujifilm X-M1 and Fujifilm X-A1 are Fujifilm APS-C bodies from different lines — the X-M and the X-A. Both launched in 2013. At launch the X-M1 was 699 USD and the X-A1 599 USD, making the X-A1 the more affordable of the two.
The X-M1 doesn't win any of the headline spec categories outright. Its case is price, size, and how it feels in your hand, not the numbers.
The X-A1 can't match those numbers. What it has going for it is a lower price, a smaller footprint, or just being the body you'd rather carry.
So which one? If you want the more capable all-rounder, get the X-M1. If the simpler, cheaper option is closer to what you actually need, the X-A1 is the smarter buy. And the X-A1 costs less — 599 USD at launch.
Where the X-M1 wins
No clear wins on the headline specs — its case is price, size, or feel.
Where the X-A1 wins
No clear wins on the headline specs — its case is price, size, or feel.
Who should buy the X-M1 or X-A1?
Buy the X-M1 if…
If you already shoot Fuji and just want the cheaper available body, the X-M1 is the practical pick. Read the full X-M1 review for the use-case-specific pros and cons.
Buy the X-A1 if…
If you already shoot Fuji and just want the cheaper available body, the X-A1 is the practical pick. It also launched cheaper at 599 USD. Read the full X-A1 review for the use-case-specific pros and cons.
X-M1 vs X-A1: pros and cons
| Fujifilm X-M1 | Fujifilm X-A1 |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Pros and cons mirror the in-house X-M1 review and X-A1 review.
X-M1 vs X-A1: full specs
| Spec |  X-M12013 · $699 | X-A1 2013 · $599 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Release year | 2013 | 2013 |
| Launch price | 699 USD | 599 USD |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Sensor & Image | ||
| Megapixels | 16.3 MP | 16.3 MP |
| Sensor generation | X-Trans I | Bayer |
| Processor | EXR Processor II | EXR Processor II |
| ISO range | 200–6400 | 200–6400 |
| Autofocus & Burst | ||
| AF points | 49 | 49 |
| Subject detection | none | none |
| Burst (fps) | 5.6 | 5.6 |
| Video | ||
| Max video | 1080p 30p | 1080p 30p |
| Codec | H.264 | H.264 |
| Log profile | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Stabilization | None | None |
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| LCD | 3" tilt | 3" tilt |
| Weather sealed | No | No |
| Weight | 330g | 330g |
| Storage | ||
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Card types | SD UHS-I | SD UHS-I |
| Power | ||
| Battery | NP-W126 | NP-W126 |
| Battery life (CIPA) | 350 shots | 350 shots |
| Software | ||
| Film sims | 5 | 5 |
Highlighted cells are best in class between these two. Specs sourced from public Fujifilm product pages.
In-depth reviews
For the full long-form review of each camera, see the Fujifilm X-M1 review and the Fujifilm X-A1 review. Each one carries the full spec breakdown, pros and cons, and where this body sits in the current Fujifilm lineup.