Fujifilm X-Pro2 vs X-T2: full comparison
The X-Pro2 leads on more headline specs, but the X-T2 counters on 4K/30p video.
Also searched as XPro2 vs XT2, and in the other order as XT2 vs XPro2.
Not sure which one fits? Take the Fujifilm camera quiz and we will score both bodies against your answers.
The short version
The Fujifilm X-Pro2 and Fujifilm X-T2 are Fujifilm APS-C bodies from different lines — the X-Pro and the X-T. Both launched in 2016. At launch the X-Pro2 was 1,699 USD and the X-T2 1,599 USD, making the X-T2 the more affordable of the two.
On paper the X-Pro2 is the stronger body of the two. It gives you a hybrid optical/electronic viewfinder, 350-shot battery life, and a lighter 495g body.
The X-T2 isn't far behind. It hits back with 4K/30p video.
So which one? If you want a hybrid optical/electronic viewfinder, get the X-Pro2. If 4K/30p video is closer to what you actually need, the X-T2 is the smarter buy. And the X-T2 costs less — 1,599 USD at launch.
Where the X-Pro2 wins
- +a hybrid optical/electronic viewfinder
- +350-shot battery life
- +a lighter 495g body
Where the X-T2 wins
- +4K/30p video
Who should buy the X-Pro2 or X-T2?
Buy the X-Pro2 if…
Pick the X-Pro2 if a hybrid optical/electronic viewfinder, 350-shot battery life matters to you. It is the better fit for buyers who already lean toward X-Pro handling. Read the full X-Pro2 review for the use-case-specific pros and cons.
Buy the X-T2 if…
Pick the X-T2 if 4K/30p video matters to you. It also launched cheaper at 1,599 USD. It is the better fit for buyers who already lean toward X-T handling. Read the full X-T2 review for the use-case-specific pros and cons.
X-Pro2 vs X-T2: pros and cons
| Fujifilm X-Pro2 | Fujifilm X-T2 |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Pros and cons mirror the in-house X-Pro2 review and X-T2 review.
X-Pro2 vs X-T2: full specs
| Spec |  X-Pro22016 · $1,699 |  X-T22016 · $1,599 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Release year | 2016 | 2016 |
| Launch price | 1,699 USD | 1,599 USD |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Sensor & Image | ||
| Megapixels | 24.3 MP | 24.3 MP |
| Sensor generation | X-Trans III | X-Trans III |
| Processor | X-Processor Pro | X-Processor Pro |
| ISO range | 200–12800 | 200–12800 |
| Autofocus & Burst | ||
| AF points | 273 | 325 |
| Subject detection | none | none |
| Burst (fps) | 8 | 8 |
| Video | ||
| Max video | 1080p 60p | 4K 30p |
| Codec | H.264 | H.264 |
| Log profile | No | F-Log |
| Physical | ||
| Stabilization | None | None |
| Viewfinder | Hybrid OVF/EVF (2.36M dot) | EVF (2.36M dot) |
| LCD | 3" fixed | 3" tilt |
| Weather sealed | Yes | Yes |
| Weight | 495g | 507g |
| Storage | ||
| Card slots | 2 | 2 |
| Card types | SD UHS-II / SD UHS-II | SD UHS-II / SD UHS-II |
| Power | ||
| Battery | NP-W126 | NP-W126S |
| Battery life (CIPA) | 350 shots | 340 shots |
| Software | ||
| Film sims | 5 | 5 |
Highlighted cells are best in class between these two. Specs sourced from public Fujifilm product pages.
In-depth reviews
For the full long-form review of each camera, see the Fujifilm X-Pro2 review and the Fujifilm X-T2 review. Each one carries the full spec breakdown, pros and cons, and where this body sits in the current Fujifilm lineup.