Fujifilm X-Pro2 vs X100F: full comparison
The X-Pro2 leads on more headline specs, but the X100F counters on a lighter 469g body.
Also searched as XPro2 vs X100F, and in the other order as X100F vs XPro2.
Not sure which one fits? Take the Fujifilm camera quiz and we will score both bodies against your answers.
The short version
The Fujifilm X-Pro2 and Fujifilm X100F are Fujifilm APS-C bodies from different lines — the X-Pro and the X100. The X100F is the newer of the two, arriving in 2017. At launch the X-Pro2 was 1,699 USD and the X100F 1,299 USD, making the X100F the more affordable of the two.
On paper the X-Pro2 is the stronger body of the two. It gives you 350-shot battery life, weather sealing, and 2 card slots.
The X100F isn't far behind. It hits back with a lighter 469g body.
So which one? If you want 350-shot battery life, get the X-Pro2. If a lighter 469g body is closer to what you actually need, the X100F is the smarter buy. And the X100F costs less — 1,299 USD at launch.
Where the X-Pro2 wins
- +350-shot battery life
- +weather sealing
- +2 card slots
Where the X100F wins
- +a lighter 469g body
Who should buy the X-Pro2 or X100F?
Buy the X-Pro2 if…
Pick the X-Pro2 if 350-shot battery life, weather sealing matters to you. It is the better fit for buyers who already lean toward X-Pro handling. Read the full X-Pro2 review for the use-case-specific pros and cons.
Buy the X100F if…
Pick the X100F if a lighter 469g body matters to you. It also launched cheaper at 1,299 USD. It is the better fit for buyers who already lean toward X100 handling. Read the full X100F review for the use-case-specific pros and cons.
X-Pro2 vs X100F: pros and cons
| Fujifilm X-Pro2 | Fujifilm X100F |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Pros and cons mirror the in-house X-Pro2 review and X100F review.
X-Pro2 vs X100F: full specs
| Spec | 2016 · $1,699 | 2017 · $1,299 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Release year | 2016 | 2017 |
| Launch price | 1,699 USD | 1,299 USD |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Sensor & Image | ||
| Megapixels | 24.3 MP | 24.3 MP |
| Sensor generation | X-Trans III | X-Trans III |
| Processor | X-Processor Pro | X-Processor Pro |
| ISO range | 200–12800 | 200–12800 |
| Autofocus & Burst | ||
| AF points | 273 | 325 |
| Subject detection | none | none |
| Burst (fps) | 8 | 8 |
| Video | ||
| Max video | 1080p 60p | 1080p 60p |
| Codec | H.264 | H.264 |
| Log profile | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Stabilization | None | None |
| Viewfinder | Hybrid OVF/EVF (2.36M dot) | Hybrid OVF/EVF (2.36M dot) |
| LCD | 3" fixed | 3" fixed |
| Weather sealed | Yes | No |
| Weight | 495g | 469g |
| Storage | ||
| Card slots | 2 | 1 |
| Card types | SD UHS-II / SD UHS-II | SD UHS-I |
| Power | ||
| Battery | NP-W126 | NP-W126S |
| Battery life (CIPA) | 350 shots | 270 shots |
| Software | ||
| Film sims | 5 | 5 |
Highlighted cells are best in class between these two. Specs sourced from public Fujifilm product pages.
In-depth reviews
For the full long-form review of each camera, see the Fujifilm X-Pro2 review and the Fujifilm X100F review. Each one carries the full spec breakdown, pros and cons, and where this body sits in the current Fujifilm lineup.