Fujifilm X-T200 vs X-T30: full comparison
The X-T30 leads on more headline specs, but the X-T200 counters on a lighter 370g body.
Also searched as XT200 vs XT30, and in the other order as XT30 vs XT200.
Not sure which one fits? Take the Fujifilm camera quiz and we will score both bodies against your answers.
The short version
The Fujifilm X-T200 and Fujifilm X-T30 are both Fujifilm X-T bodies. The X-T200 is the newer of the two, arriving in 2020. At launch the X-T200 was 799 USD and the X-T30 899 USD, making the X-T200 the more affordable of the two.
On paper the X-T200 is the stronger body of the two. It gives you a lighter 370g body.
The X-T30 isn't far behind. It hits back with 26.1 MP of resolution and 380-shot battery life.
So which one? If you want a lighter 370g body, get the X-T200. If 26.1 MP of resolution is closer to what you actually need, the X-T30 is the smarter buy. And the X-T200 costs less — 799 USD at launch.
Where the X-T200 wins
- +a lighter 370g body
Where the X-T30 wins
- +26.1 MP of resolution
- +380-shot battery life
Who should buy the X-T200 or X-T30?
Buy the X-T200 if…
Pick the X-T200 if a lighter 370g body matters to you. It also launched cheaper at 799 USD. It is the better fit for buyers who already lean toward X-T handling. Read the full X-T200 review for the use-case-specific pros and cons.
Buy the X-T30 if…
Pick the X-T30 if 26.1 MP of resolution, 380-shot battery life matters to you. It is the better fit for buyers who already lean toward X-T handling. Read the full X-T30 review for the use-case-specific pros and cons.
X-T200 vs X-T30: pros and cons
| Fujifilm X-T200 | Fujifilm X-T30 |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Pros and cons mirror the in-house X-T200 review and X-T30 review.
X-T200 vs X-T30: full specs
| Spec |  X-T2002020 · $799 |  X-T302019 · $899 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Release year | 2020 | 2019 |
| Launch price | 799 USD | 899 USD |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Sensor & Image | ||
| Megapixels | 24.2 MP | 26.1 MP |
| Sensor generation | Bayer | X-Trans IV |
| Processor | Unnamed Bayer engine | X-Processor 4 |
| ISO range | 200–12800 | 160–12800 |
| Autofocus & Burst | ||
| AF points | 425 | 425 |
| Subject detection | face-eye | face-eye |
| Burst (fps) | 8 | 8 |
| Video | ||
| Max video | 4K 30p | 4K 30p |
| Codec | H.264 | H.264 |
| Log profile | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Stabilization | None | None |
| Viewfinder | EVF (2.36M dot) | EVF (2.36M dot) |
| LCD | 3.5" flip touch | 3" tilt touch |
| Weather sealed | No | No |
| Weight | 370g | 383g |
| Storage | ||
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Card types | SD UHS-I | SD UHS-I |
| Power | ||
| Battery | NP-W126S | NP-W126S |
| Battery life (CIPA) | 270 shots | 380 shots |
| Software | ||
| Film sims | 5 | 6 |
Highlighted cells are best in class between these two. Specs sourced from public Fujifilm product pages.
In-depth reviews
For the full long-form review of each camera, see the Fujifilm X-T200 review and the Fujifilm X-T30 review. Each one carries the full spec breakdown, pros and cons, and where this body sits in the current Fujifilm lineup.