Fujifilm X-T30 II vs X-T200: full comparison
The X-T30 II leads on more headline specs, but the X-T200 counters on a lighter 370g body.
Also searched as XT30 II vs XT200, and in the other order as XT200 vs XT30 II.
Not sure which one fits? Take the Fujifilm camera quiz and we will score both bodies against your answers.
The short version
The Fujifilm X-T30 II and Fujifilm X-T200 are both Fujifilm X-T bodies. The X-T30 II is the newer of the two, arriving in 2021. At launch the X-T30 II was 899 USD and the X-T200 799 USD, making the X-T200 the more affordable of the two.
On paper the X-T30 II is the stronger body of the two. It gives you 26.1 MP of resolution and 380-shot battery life.
The X-T200 isn't far behind. It hits back with a lighter 370g body.
So which one? If you want 26.1 MP of resolution, get the X-T30 II. If a lighter 370g body is closer to what you actually need, the X-T200 is the smarter buy. And the X-T200 costs less — 799 USD at launch.
Where the X-T30 II wins
- +26.1 MP of resolution
- +380-shot battery life
Where the X-T200 wins
- +a lighter 370g body
Who should buy the X-T30 II or X-T200?
Buy the X-T30 II if…
Pick the X-T30 II if 26.1 MP of resolution, 380-shot battery life matters to you. It is the better fit for buyers who already lean toward X-T handling. Read the full X-T30 II review for the use-case-specific pros and cons.
Buy the X-T200 if…
Pick the X-T200 if a lighter 370g body matters to you. It also launched cheaper at 799 USD. It is the better fit for buyers who already lean toward X-T handling. Read the full X-T200 review for the use-case-specific pros and cons.
X-T30 II vs X-T200: pros and cons
| Fujifilm X-T30 II | Fujifilm X-T200 |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Pros and cons mirror the in-house X-T30 II review and X-T200 review.
X-T30 II vs X-T200: full specs
| Spec |  X-T30 II2021 · $899 |  X-T2002020 · $799 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Release year | 2021 | 2020 |
| Launch price | 899 USD | 799 USD |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Sensor & Image | ||
| Megapixels | 26.1 MP | 24.2 MP |
| Sensor generation | X-Trans IV | Bayer |
| Processor | X-Processor 4 | Unnamed Bayer engine |
| ISO range | 160–12800 | 200–12800 |
| Autofocus & Burst | ||
| AF points | 425 | 425 |
| Subject detection | face-eye | face-eye |
| Burst (fps) | 8 | 8 |
| Video | ||
| Max video | 4K 30p | 4K 30p |
| Codec | H.265, H.264 | H.264 |
| Log profile | F-Log | No |
| Physical | ||
| Stabilization | None | None |
| Viewfinder | EVF (2.36M dot) | EVF (2.36M dot) |
| LCD | 3" tilt touch | 3.5" flip touch |
| Weather sealed | No | No |
| Weight | 378g | 370g |
| Storage | ||
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Card types | SD UHS-I | SD UHS-I |
| Power | ||
| Battery | NP-W126S | NP-W126S |
| Battery life (CIPA) | 380 shots | 270 shots |
| Software | ||
| Film sims | 7 | 5 |
Highlighted cells are best in class between these two. Specs sourced from public Fujifilm product pages.
In-depth reviews
For the full long-form review of each camera, see the Fujifilm X-T30 II review and the Fujifilm X-T200 review. Each one carries the full spec breakdown, pros and cons, and where this body sits in the current Fujifilm lineup.