Fujifilm XF 27mm F2.8 R WR vs Fujifilm XF 35mm F1.4 R: full comparison

The XF 27mm F2.8 R WR and XF 35mm F1.4 R trade blows evenly — the right pick comes down to focal length and what you shoot.

The short version

The Fujifilm XF 27mm F2.8 R WR and Fujifilm XF 35mm F1.4 R are two XF primes at different focal lengths — the XF 27mm F2.8 R WR (41mm equivalent) and the XF 35mm F1.4 R (53mm equivalent). The XF 27mm F2.8 R WR is the newer design, from 2021.

On the spec sheet the XF 27mm F2.8 R WR pulls ahead with a lighter 84g body, a more compact 23 mm barrel, and weather sealing.

The XF 35mm F1.4 R answers with a brighter f/1.4 maximum aperture, closer 0.28 m focusing, and higher 0.17× magnification.

So which one? Start with the focal length you actually want to shoot: the 41mm-equivalent XF 27mm F2.8 R WR or the 53mm-equivalent XF 35mm F1.4 R. Once that's settled, XF 27mm F2.8 R WR has the edge on the specs above.

Where the XF 27mm F2.8 R WR wins

  • +a lighter 84g body
  • +a more compact 23 mm barrel
  • +weather sealing

Where the XF 35mm F1.4 R wins

  • +a brighter f/1.4 maximum aperture
  • +closer 0.28 m focusing
  • +higher 0.17× magnification

Who should buy the XF 27mm F2.8 R WR or XF 35mm F1.4 R?

Buy the XF 27mm F2.8 R WR if…

Pick the XF 27mm F2.8 R WR if a lighter 84g body and a more compact 23 mm barrel matter to you. Photographers for whom size is the deciding feature — the lightest Fuji kit, a jacket-pocket travel setup, or a discreet street camera that behaves like an X100. Read the full XF 27mm F2.8 R WR review for the details.

Buy the XF 35mm F1.4 R if…

Pick the XF 35mm F1.4 R if a brighter f/1.4 maximum aperture and closer 0.28 m focusing matter to you. Photographers who want character over measurements at a 53 mm-equivalent view, and who shoot subjects that hold still long enough for 2012 autofocus. Read the full XF 35mm F1.4 R review for the details.

XF 27mm F2.8 R WR vs XF 35mm F1.4 R: pros and cons

Fujifilm XF 27mm F2.8 R WRFujifilm XF 35mm F1.4 R
  • Smallest autofocus lens Fujifilm makes — 84g, turns a small body into an X100-sized rig.
  • Very sharp with rich colour and strong micro-contrast; excellent SOOC JPEGs.
  • R WR update adds weather sealing and an aperture ring over the 2013 original.
  • Beats the cheaper TTArtisan 27mm on corners, vignetting, and build.
  • Rendering the later f/2 primes do not match — warm, soft-edged, short falloff.
  • 187g and 50.4 mm; small enough to live on an X-E body permanently.
  • 0.28 m macro mode at 0.17× covers food and detail work.
  • Clicked aperture ring, metal barrel, 52 mm filters shared with the XF 18mm F2 R.
  • Cheap used, because Fujifilm has sold them for over a decade.
  • Autofocus is slow-ish and audible — the focus noise carries into in-camera video audio.
  • f/2.8 is a stop slower than the Fujicron primes; 0.34 m minimum focus is the longest of them.
  • 41 mm-equivalent is a divisive "no man's land" — optically fine, stylistically flat for some.
  • Roughly 2.5× the price of the TTArtisan 27mm for a modest optical edge.
  • DC-motor autofocus hunts audibly in low light and low contrast.
  • Aperture blades are audible; both noises reach in-camera video audio.
  • No weather sealing and no stabilization.
  • Soft corners and longitudinal colour fringing wide open until about f/2.8.

Pros and cons mirror the in-house XF 27mm F2.8 R WR review and XF 35mm F1.4 R review.

XF 27mm F2.8 R WR vs XF 35mm F1.4 R: full specs

SpecXF 27mm F2.8 R WR
27 mm · f/2.8 · 84g
XF 35mm F1.4 R
35 mm · f/1.4 · 187g
Optical
Focal length27 mm35 mm
35mm equivalent41 mm53 mm
Maximum aperturef/2.8f/1.4
Minimum aperturef/16f/16
Optical construction7 elements in 5 groups8 elements in 6 groups
Special elements1 aspherical element1 aspherical element
Aperture blades77
Focus & Stabilization
Min. focus distance0.34 m0.28 m
Max. magnification0.1×0.17×
Autofocus motorDC coreless motorDC motor
Optical stabilizationNoNo
Physical
Filter thread39 mm52 mm
Diameter × length61.2 × 23 mm65 × 50.4 mm
Weight84g187g
Weather sealingYesNo
Min. operating temp-10 °C
General
Announced2021-01-272012-01-09

Highlighted cells are best in class between these two. Specs sourced from the manufacturers' public product pages.

In-depth reviews

For the full long-form review of each lens, see the Fujifilm XF 27mm F2.8 R WR review and the Fujifilm XF 35mm F1.4 R review. Each carries the full spec breakdown, pros and cons, and where the lens sits in the X-mount lineup.