Voigtländer Ultron 27mm F2 X vs Viltrox Viltrox AF 33mm f/1.4: full comparison
The Viltrox gives you f/1.4 and autofocus for less, and the Ultron is smaller, with better controls and manual focus.
The short version
This one comes down to autofocus and how the lens feels in your hand. The Viltrox AF 33mm f/1.4 has fast autofocus that's almost silent, even for video. The Ultron 27mm f/2 has no autofocus. The Viltrox came out in 2020 at around $239, and the Ultron costs around $600.
Check the view as well. On a Fujifilm X camera, the Viltrox shows about what a 50mm lens shows on a 35mm film camera. That's the classic normal view. The Ultron shows about 40mm, which is a little wider.
The Ultron wins on size and controls. It's 120g and 23.5 mm long, and the Viltrox is 270g and 72 mm long. The Ultron's aperture ring clicks in small steps. Its focus tab has a hard infinity stop, so the ring stops dead at infinity. The Viltrox aperture ring has no clicks and no numbers. You set it by watching the screen. That's smooth for video, but it's easy to move by accident in a bag.
Viltrox's own store no longer lists the X-mount version of this lens, so support for future cameras is uncertain. The Ultron is the newer lens, from 2023.
Where the Ultron 27mm F2 X wins
- +a lighter 120g body
- +a more compact 23.5 mm barrel
- +closer 0.25 m focusing
- +higher 0.15× magnification
- +a 10-blade diaphragm
Where the Viltrox AF 33mm f/1.4 wins
- +a brighter f/1.4 maximum aperture
- +autofocus at all, where the Ultron 27mm F2 X is manual focus only
Who should buy the Ultron 27mm F2 X or Viltrox AF 33mm f/1.4?
Buy the Ultron 27mm F2 X if…
Pick the Ultron if you enjoy handling the camera. Its metal build, clicked aperture ring and small size suit slow street and travel shooting.
Buy the Viltrox AF 33mm f/1.4 if…
Pick the Viltrox if you want f/1.4 with autofocus for the least money. It's good for portraits, low light and video. It works best on subjects that don't move fast.
Ultron 27mm F2 X vs Viltrox AF 33mm f/1.4: pros and cons
| Voigtländer Ultron 27mm F2 X | Viltrox Viltrox AF 33mm f/1.4 |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Pros and cons mirror the in-house Ultron 27mm F2 X review and Viltrox AF 33mm f/1.4 review.
Ultron 27mm F2 X vs Viltrox AF 33mm f/1.4: full specs
| Spec | Ultron 27mm F2 X 27 mm · f/2 · 120g | Viltrox AF 33mm f/1.4 33 mm · f/1.4 · 270g |
|---|---|---|
| Optical | ||
| Focal length | 27 mm | 33 mm |
| 35mm equivalent | 40 mm | 50 mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/2 | f/1.4 |
| Minimum aperture | f/22 | f/16 |
| Optical construction | 6 elements in 4 groups | 10 elements in 9 groups |
| Special elements | 1 extra-low-dispersion element, no aspherical glass | 1 ED element, 1 high-refractive-index element, HD Nano coating |
| Aperture blades | 10 | 9 |
| Focus & Stabilization | ||
| Min. focus distance | 0.25 m | 0.40 m |
| Max. magnification | 0.15× | 0.1× |
| Autofocus motor | Manual focus only | Stepping motor |
| Optical stabilization | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Filter thread | 43 mm | 52 mm |
| Diameter × length | 59.3 × 23.5 mm | 65 × 72 mm |
| Weight | 120g | 270g |
| Weather sealing | No | No |
| Min. operating temp | — | — |
| General | ||
| Announced | 2023-05-15 | 2020-04-21 |
Highlighted cells are best in class between these two. Specs sourced from the manufacturers' public product pages.
In-depth reviews
For the full long-form review of each lens, see the Voigtländer Ultron 27mm F2 X review and the Viltrox Viltrox AF 33mm f/1.4 review. Each carries the full spec breakdown, pros and cons, and where the lens sits in the X-mount lineup.