Voigtländer Ultron 27mm F2 X vs Fujifilm XF 35mm F2 R WR: full comparison
The Ultron 27mm F2 X leads on more of the measurable specs, but the XF 35mm F2 R WR counters on autofocus at all, where the Ultron 27mm F2 X is manual focus only and weather sealing.
The short version
The Voigtländer Ultron 27mm F2 X and Fujifilm XF 35mm F2 R WR are two X-mount primes at different focal lengths — the Ultron 27mm F2 X (40mm equivalent) and the XF 35mm F2 R WR (53mm equivalent). The Ultron 27mm F2 X is the newer design, from 2023.
On the spec sheet the Ultron 27mm F2 X pulls ahead with a lighter 120g body, a more compact 23.5 mm barrel, and closer 0.25 m focusing, plus a couple of smaller edges.
The XF 35mm F2 R WR answers with autofocus at all, where the Ultron 27mm F2 X is manual focus only and weather sealing.
So which one? Start with the focal length you actually want to shoot: the 40mm-equivalent Ultron 27mm F2 X or the 53mm-equivalent XF 35mm F2 R WR. Once that's settled, Ultron 27mm F2 X has the edge on the specs above.
Where the Ultron 27mm F2 X wins
- +a lighter 120g body
- +a more compact 23.5 mm barrel
- +closer 0.25 m focusing
- +higher 0.15× magnification
- +a 10-blade diaphragm
Where the XF 35mm F2 R WR wins
- +autofocus at all, where the Ultron 27mm F2 X is manual focus only
- +weather sealing
Who should buy the Ultron 27mm F2 X or XF 35mm F2 R WR?
Buy the Ultron 27mm F2 X if…
Pick the Ultron 27mm F2 X if a lighter 120g body and a more compact 23.5 mm barrel matter to you. Photographers who want the deliberate, set-the-camera-first way of shooting a rangefinder-style prime on a small Fuji body, and who value rendering and build over autofocus and sealing. Read the full Ultron 27mm F2 X review for the details.
Buy the XF 35mm F2 R WR if…
Pick the XF 35mm F2 R WR if autofocus at all, where the Ultron 27mm F2 X is manual focus only and weather sealing matter to you. Photographers who want one sharp, reliable, weather-sealed 53 mm-equivalent standard prime and value consistency over a distinctive rendering. Read the full XF 35mm F2 R WR review for the details.
Ultron 27mm F2 X vs XF 35mm F2 R WR: pros and cons
| Voigtländer Ultron 27mm F2 X | Fujifilm XF 35mm F2 R WR |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Pros and cons mirror the in-house Ultron 27mm F2 X review and XF 35mm F2 R WR review.
Ultron 27mm F2 X vs XF 35mm F2 R WR: full specs
| Spec | Ultron 27mm F2 X 27 mm · f/2 · 120g | XF 35mm F2 R WR 35 mm · f/2 · 170g |
|---|---|---|
| Optical | ||
| Focal length | 27 mm | 35 mm |
| 35mm equivalent | 40 mm | 53 mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/2 | f/2 |
| Minimum aperture | f/22 | f/16 |
| Optical construction | 6 elements in 4 groups | 9 elements in 6 groups |
| Special elements | 1 extra-low-dispersion element, no aspherical glass | 2 aspherical elements |
| Aperture blades | 10 | 9 |
| Focus & Stabilization | ||
| Min. focus distance | 0.25 m | 0.35 m |
| Max. magnification | 0.15× | 0.14× |
| Autofocus motor | Manual focus only | Stepping motor |
| Optical stabilization | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Filter thread | 43 mm | 43 mm |
| Diameter × length | 59.3 × 23.5 mm | 60 × 45.9 mm |
| Weight | 120g | 170g |
| Weather sealing | No | Yes |
| Min. operating temp | — | -10 °C |
| General | ||
| Announced | 2023-05-15 | 2015-10-21 |
Highlighted cells are best in class between these two. Specs sourced from the manufacturers' public product pages.
In-depth reviews
For the full long-form review of each lens, see the Voigtländer Ultron 27mm F2 X review and the Fujifilm XF 35mm F2 R WR review. Each carries the full spec breakdown, pros and cons, and where the lens sits in the X-mount lineup.