Voigtländer Ultron 27mm F2 X vs Fujifilm XF 35mm F2 R WR: full comparison
Pick the view first: 40mm for the small manual Ultron, 53mm for the sealed autofocus XF 35mm f/2.
The short version
Pick the focal length first. On a Fujifilm X camera, the Ultron 27mm shows about what a 40mm lens shows on a 35mm film camera. The XF 35mm f/2 shows about 53mm. The 40mm view is a little wider than a classic 50mm lens. It suits street, travel and everyday photos. The 53mm view is tighter and works for portraits, street and general work.
Then pick how you want to focus. The XF 35mm f/2 has fast, almost silent autofocus on new bodies. It's weather sealed, which means it's built to resist rain. It's also a "Fujicron", the nickname for Fujifilm's small f/2 lenses. It's sharp from f/2.
The Ultron is manual focus only. It's smaller, at 120g and 23.5 mm long, against 170g and 45.9 mm. It focuses closer too, to 0.25 m. Focus falls off quickly, so your subject stands out more than with the clean Fujicron lenses.
Manual focus can be hard at middle distances. On a DPReview forum thread, one owner said precise focus between about eight feet and infinity was "extremely difficult". He sold his Ultron and went back to the XF 16mm and 35mm f/2. The XF 35mm f/2 came out in 2015. The Ultron is the newer lens, from 2023.
Where the Ultron 27mm F2 X wins
- +a lighter 120g body
- +a more compact 23.5 mm barrel
- +closer 0.25 m focusing
- +higher 0.15× magnification
- +a 10-blade diaphragm
Where the XF 35mm F2 R WR wins
- +autofocus at all, where the Ultron 27mm F2 X is manual focus only
- +weather sealing
Who should buy the Ultron 27mm F2 X or XF 35mm F2 R WR?
Buy the Ultron 27mm F2 X if…
Pick the Ultron if you want a 40mm view in a tiny lens, and you enjoy setting focus yourself. It's about half the length of the XF 35mm f/2, and subjects stand out more.
Buy the XF 35mm F2 R WR if…
Pick the XF 35mm f/2 if you need autofocus for moving subjects and a lens that can take rain. It's sharp from f/2 and quick to focus on new bodies.
Ultron 27mm F2 X vs XF 35mm F2 R WR: pros and cons
| Voigtländer Ultron 27mm F2 X | Fujifilm XF 35mm F2 R WR |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Pros and cons mirror the in-house Ultron 27mm F2 X review and XF 35mm F2 R WR review.
Ultron 27mm F2 X vs XF 35mm F2 R WR: full specs
| Spec | Ultron 27mm F2 X 27 mm · f/2 · 120g | XF 35mm F2 R WR 35 mm · f/2 · 170g |
|---|---|---|
| Optical | ||
| Focal length | 27 mm | 35 mm |
| 35mm equivalent | 40 mm | 53 mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/2 | f/2 |
| Minimum aperture | f/22 | f/16 |
| Optical construction | 6 elements in 4 groups | 9 elements in 6 groups |
| Special elements | 1 extra-low-dispersion element, no aspherical glass | 2 aspherical elements |
| Aperture blades | 10 | 9 |
| Focus & Stabilization | ||
| Min. focus distance | 0.25 m | 0.35 m |
| Max. magnification | 0.15× | 0.14× |
| Autofocus motor | Manual focus only | Stepping motor |
| Optical stabilization | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Filter thread | 43 mm | 43 mm |
| Diameter × length | 59.3 × 23.5 mm | 60 × 45.9 mm |
| Weight | 120g | 170g |
| Weather sealing | No | Yes |
| Min. operating temp | — | -10 °C |
| General | ||
| Announced | 2023-05-15 | 2015-10-21 |
Highlighted cells are best in class between these two. Specs sourced from the manufacturers' public product pages.
In-depth reviews
For the full long-form review of each lens, see the Voigtländer Ultron 27mm F2 X review and the Fujifilm XF 35mm F2 R WR review. Each carries the full spec breakdown, pros and cons, and where the lens sits in the X-mount lineup.