Voigtländer Ultron 27mm F2 X vs Voigtländer Nokton 35mm F1.2 X: full comparison
The Ultron 27mm F2 X leads on more of the measurable specs, but the Nokton 35mm F1.2 X counters on a brighter f/1.2 maximum aperture and a 12-blade diaphragm.
The short version
The Voigtländer Ultron 27mm F2 X and Voigtländer Nokton 35mm F1.2 X are two X-mount primes at different focal lengths — the Ultron 27mm F2 X (40mm equivalent) and the Nokton 35mm F1.2 X (52.5mm equivalent). The Ultron 27mm F2 X is the newer design, from 2023.
On the spec sheet the Ultron 27mm F2 X pulls ahead with a lighter 120g body, a more compact 23.5 mm barrel, and closer 0.25 m focusing.
The Nokton 35mm F1.2 X answers with a brighter f/1.2 maximum aperture and a 12-blade diaphragm.
So which one? Start with the focal length you actually want to shoot: the 40mm-equivalent Ultron 27mm F2 X or the 52.5mm-equivalent Nokton 35mm F1.2 X. Once that's settled, Ultron 27mm F2 X has the edge on the specs above.
Where the Ultron 27mm F2 X wins
- +a lighter 120g body
- +a more compact 23.5 mm barrel
- +closer 0.25 m focusing
Where the Nokton 35mm F1.2 X wins
- +a brighter f/1.2 maximum aperture
- +a 12-blade diaphragm
Who should buy the Ultron 27mm F2 X or Nokton 35mm F1.2 X?
Buy the Ultron 27mm F2 X if…
Pick the Ultron 27mm F2 X if a lighter 120g body and a more compact 23.5 mm barrel matter to you. Photographers who want the deliberate, set-the-camera-first way of shooting a rangefinder-style prime on a small Fuji body, and who value rendering and build over autofocus and sealing. Read the full Ultron 27mm F2 X review for the details.
Buy the Nokton 35mm F1.2 X if…
Pick the Nokton 35mm F1.2 X if a brighter f/1.2 maximum aperture and a 12-blade diaphragm matter to you. Photographers who already enjoy manual focus and want the fastest, most tactile normal prime in the mount, particularly on an X-Pro body. Read the full Nokton 35mm F1.2 X review for the details.
Ultron 27mm F2 X vs Nokton 35mm F1.2 X: pros and cons
| Voigtländer Ultron 27mm F2 X | Voigtländer Nokton 35mm F1.2 X |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Pros and cons mirror the in-house Ultron 27mm F2 X review and Nokton 35mm F1.2 X review.
Ultron 27mm F2 X vs Nokton 35mm F1.2 X: full specs
| Spec | Ultron 27mm F2 X 27 mm · f/2 · 120g | Nokton 35mm F1.2 X 35 mm · f/1.2 · 196g |
|---|---|---|
| Optical | ||
| Focal length | 27 mm | 35 mm |
| 35mm equivalent | 40 mm | 52.5 mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/2 | f/1.2 |
| Minimum aperture | f/22 | f/16 |
| Optical construction | 6 elements in 4 groups | 8 elements in 6 groups |
| Special elements | 1 extra-low-dispersion element, no aspherical glass | 1 abnormal partial dispersion element |
| Aperture blades | 10 | 12 |
| Focus & Stabilization | ||
| Min. focus distance | 0.25 m | 0.30 m |
| Max. magnification | 0.15× | — |
| Autofocus motor | Manual focus only | Manual focus only |
| Optical stabilization | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Filter thread | 43 mm | 46 mm |
| Diameter × length | 59.3 × 23.5 mm | 59.6 × 39.8 mm |
| Weight | 120g | 196g |
| Weather sealing | No | No |
| Min. operating temp | — | — |
| General | ||
| Announced | 2023-05-15 | 2021-07-15 |
Highlighted cells are best in class between these two. Specs sourced from the manufacturers' public product pages.
In-depth reviews
For the full long-form review of each lens, see the Voigtländer Ultron 27mm F2 X review and the Voigtländer Nokton 35mm F1.2 X review. Each carries the full spec breakdown, pros and cons, and where the lens sits in the X-mount lineup.