Voigtländer Ultron 27mm F2 X vs Voigtländer Nokton 35mm F1.2 X: full comparison
Both are metal manual lenses, so pick the view: a small, sharp 40mm Ultron or a 52.5mm Nokton that glows at f/1.2.
The short version
These are the two Voigtländer lenses Cosina makes for Fujifilm X. Both are all metal and manual focus only. Both have electronic contacts. These let the camera know which lens is on, so the focus aids work and the aperture is saved in EXIF. EXIF is the shooting data inside each photo.
So choose by the view and by how you want the photos to look. On a Fujifilm X camera, the Ultron 27mm f/2 shows about what a 40mm lens shows on a 35mm film camera. It's a 120g pancake. The Nokton 35mm f/1.2 shows about 52.5mm and weighs 196g.
At f/1.2, the Nokton is soft and glows around bright spots. It gets sharp by about f/2. Its twelve rounded blades keep out-of-focus lights round. The Ultron's ten straight blades make ten-point sunstars from about f/2.8. A sunstar is the star shape a bright light makes in a photo. I shot into a low sun from a bridge at f/8 and got one with no haze.
Voigtländer's list of supported cameras for the Nokton stops around the X-E4 and X-T30 II. My Nokton frames from the X-Pro3, X-E4 and X-T50 still saved the right f-numbers. The Nokton came out in 2021 and the Ultron in 2023. The Ultron costs around $600 and the Nokton around 649 EUR.
Where the Ultron 27mm F2 X wins
- +a lighter 120g body
- +a more compact 23.5 mm barrel
- +closer 0.25 m focusing
Where the Nokton 35mm F1.2 X wins
- +a brighter f/1.2 maximum aperture
- +a 12-blade diaphragm
Who should buy the Ultron 27mm F2 X or Nokton 35mm F1.2 X?
Buy the Ultron 27mm F2 X if…
Pick the Ultron if you want the smallest Voigtländer for Fuji X and a 40mm view. It's sharp in the centre from f/2 and makes clean sunstars.
Buy the Nokton 35mm F1.2 X if…
Pick the Nokton if you want f/1.2 and a 52.5mm view for night streets and portraits. Buy it for the glow at f/1.2.
Ultron 27mm F2 X vs Nokton 35mm F1.2 X: pros and cons
| Voigtländer Ultron 27mm F2 X | Voigtländer Nokton 35mm F1.2 X |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Pros and cons mirror the in-house Ultron 27mm F2 X review and Nokton 35mm F1.2 X review.
Ultron 27mm F2 X vs Nokton 35mm F1.2 X: full specs
| Spec | Ultron 27mm F2 X 27 mm · f/2 · 120g | Nokton 35mm F1.2 X 35 mm · f/1.2 · 196g |
|---|---|---|
| Optical | ||
| Focal length | 27 mm | 35 mm |
| 35mm equivalent | 40 mm | 52.5 mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/2 | f/1.2 |
| Minimum aperture | f/22 | f/16 |
| Optical construction | 6 elements in 4 groups | 8 elements in 6 groups |
| Special elements | 1 extra-low-dispersion element, no aspherical glass | 1 abnormal partial dispersion element |
| Aperture blades | 10 | 12 |
| Focus & Stabilization | ||
| Min. focus distance | 0.25 m | 0.30 m |
| Max. magnification | 0.15× | — |
| Autofocus motor | Manual focus only | Manual focus only |
| Optical stabilization | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Filter thread | 43 mm | 46 mm |
| Diameter × length | 59.3 × 23.5 mm | 59.6 × 39.8 mm |
| Weight | 120g | 196g |
| Weather sealing | No | No |
| Min. operating temp | — | — |
| General | ||
| Announced | 2023-05-15 | 2021-07-15 |
Highlighted cells are best in class between these two. Specs sourced from the manufacturers' public product pages.
In-depth reviews
For the full long-form review of each lens, see the Voigtländer Ultron 27mm F2 X review and the Voigtländer Nokton 35mm F1.2 X review. Each carries the full spec breakdown, pros and cons, and where the lens sits in the X-mount lineup.