Fujifilm X-E4 vs X-T200: full comparison
The X-E4 leads on more headline specs, but the X-T200 counters on price and size.
Also searched as XE4 vs XT200, and in the other order as XT200 vs XE4.
Not sure which one fits? Take the Fujifilm camera quiz and we will score both bodies against your answers.
The short version
The Fujifilm X-E4 and Fujifilm X-T200 are Fujifilm APS-C bodies from different lines — the X-E and the X-T. The X-E4 is the newer of the two, arriving in 2021. At launch the X-E4 was 849 USD and the X-T200 799 USD, making the X-T200 the more affordable of the two.
On paper the X-E4 is the stronger body of the two. It gives you 26.1 MP of resolution, 380-shot battery life, and a lighter 364g body.
The X-T200 can't match those numbers. What it has going for it is a lower price, a smaller footprint, or just being the body you'd rather carry.
So which one? If you want 26.1 MP of resolution, get the X-E4. If the simpler, cheaper option is closer to what you actually need, the X-T200 is the smarter buy. And the X-T200 costs less — 799 USD at launch.
Where the X-E4 wins
- +26.1 MP of resolution
- +380-shot battery life
- +a lighter 364g body
Where the X-T200 wins
No clear wins on the headline specs — its case is price, size, or feel.
Who should buy the X-E4 or X-T200?
Buy the X-E4 if…
Pick the X-E4 if 26.1 MP of resolution, 380-shot battery life matters to you. It is the better fit for buyers who already lean toward X-E handling. Read the full X-E4 review for the use-case-specific pros and cons.
Buy the X-T200 if…
If you already shoot Fuji and just want the cheaper available body, the X-T200 is the practical pick. It also launched cheaper at 799 USD. Read the full X-T200 review for the use-case-specific pros and cons.
X-E4 vs X-T200: pros and cons
| Fujifilm X-E4 | Fujifilm X-T200 |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Pros and cons mirror the in-house X-E4 review and X-T200 review.
X-E4 vs X-T200: full specs
| Spec | 2021 · $849 | 2020 · $799 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Release year | 2021 | 2020 |
| Launch price | 849 USD | 799 USD |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Sensor & Image | ||
| Megapixels | 26.1 MP | 24.2 MP |
| Sensor generation | X-Trans IV | Bayer |
| Processor | X-Processor 4 | Unnamed Bayer engine |
| ISO range | 160–12800 | 200–12800 |
| Autofocus & Burst | ||
| AF points | 425 | 425 |
| Subject detection | face-eye | face-eye |
| Burst (fps) | 8 | 8 |
| Video | ||
| Max video | 4K 30p | 4K 30p |
| Codec | H.265, H.264 | H.264 |
| Log profile | F-Log | No |
| Physical | ||
| Stabilization | None | None |
| Viewfinder | EVF (2.36M dot) | EVF (2.36M dot) |
| LCD | 3" tilt touch | 3.5" flip touch |
| Weather sealed | No | No |
| Weight | 364g | 370g |
| Storage | ||
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Card types | SD UHS-I | SD UHS-I |
| Power | ||
| Battery | NP-W126S | NP-W126S |
| Battery life (CIPA) | 380 shots | 270 shots |
| Software | ||
| Film sims | 7 | 5 |
Highlighted cells are best in class between these two. Specs sourced from public Fujifilm product pages.
In-depth reviews
For the full long-form review of each camera, see the Fujifilm X-E4 review and the Fujifilm X-T200 review. Each one carries the full spec breakdown, pros and cons, and where this body sits in the current Fujifilm lineup.