Fujifilm X-T200 vs X-A7: full comparison
The X-T200 and X-A7 are closely matched — the right pick comes down to what you shoot.
Also searched as XT200 vs XA7, and in the other order as XA7 vs XT200.
Not sure which one fits? Take the Fujifilm camera quiz and we will score both bodies against your answers.
The short version
The Fujifilm X-T200 and Fujifilm X-A7 are Fujifilm APS-C bodies from different lines — the X-T and the X-A. The X-T200 is the newer of the two, arriving in 2020. At launch the X-T200 was 799 USD and the X-A7 699 USD, making the X-A7 the more affordable of the two.
On paper the X-T200 is the stronger body of the two. It gives you 8 fps continuous shooting and a 2.36M-dot electronic viewfinder.
The X-A7 isn't far behind. It hits back with 440-shot battery life and a lighter 320g body.
So which one? If you want 8 fps continuous shooting, get the X-T200. If 440-shot battery life is closer to what you actually need, the X-A7 is the smarter buy. And the X-A7 costs less — 699 USD at launch.
Where the X-T200 wins
- +8 fps continuous shooting
- +a 2.36M-dot electronic viewfinder
Where the X-A7 wins
- +440-shot battery life
- +a lighter 320g body
Who should buy the X-T200 or X-A7?
Buy the X-T200 if…
Pick the X-T200 if 8 fps continuous shooting, a 2.36M-dot electronic viewfinder matters to you. It is the better fit for buyers who already lean toward X-T handling. Read the full X-T200 review for the use-case-specific pros and cons.
Buy the X-A7 if…
Pick the X-A7 if 440-shot battery life, a lighter 320g body matters to you. It also launched cheaper at 699 USD. It is the better fit for buyers who already lean toward X-A handling. Read the full X-A7 review for the use-case-specific pros and cons.
X-T200 vs X-A7: pros and cons
| Fujifilm X-T200 | Fujifilm X-A7 |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Pros and cons mirror the in-house X-T200 review and X-A7 review.
X-T200 vs X-A7: full specs
| Spec |  X-T2002020 · $799 |  X-A72019 · $699 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Release year | 2020 | 2019 |
| Launch price | 799 USD | 699 USD |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Sensor & Image | ||
| Megapixels | 24.2 MP | 24.2 MP |
| Sensor generation | Bayer | Bayer |
| Processor | Unnamed Bayer engine | Unnamed Bayer engine |
| ISO range | 200–12800 | 200–12800 |
| Autofocus & Burst | ||
| AF points | 425 | 425 |
| Subject detection | face-eye | face-eye |
| Burst (fps) | 8 | 6 |
| Video | ||
| Max video | 4K 30p | 4K 30p |
| Codec | H.264 | H.264 |
| Log profile | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Stabilization | None | None |
| Viewfinder | EVF (2.36M dot) | None |
| LCD | 3.5" flip touch | 3.5" flip touch |
| Weather sealed | No | No |
| Weight | 370g | 320g |
| Storage | ||
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Card types | SD UHS-I | SD UHS-I |
| Power | ||
| Battery | NP-W126S | NP-W126S |
| Battery life (CIPA) | 270 shots | 440 shots |
| Software | ||
| Film sims | 5 | 5 |
Highlighted cells are best in class between these two. Specs sourced from public Fujifilm product pages.
In-depth reviews
For the full long-form review of each camera, see the Fujifilm X-T200 review and the Fujifilm X-A7 review. Each one carries the full spec breakdown, pros and cons, and where this body sits in the current Fujifilm lineup.