Fujifilm X100T vs XF10: full comparison
The XF10 leads on more headline specs, but the X100T counters on a hybrid optical/electronic viewfinder.
Not sure which one fits? Take the Fujifilm camera quiz and we will score both bodies against your answers.
The short version
The Fujifilm X100T and Fujifilm XF10 are Fujifilm APS-C bodies from different lines — the X100 and the XF10. The XF10 is the newer of the two, arriving in 2018. At launch the X100T was $1,299 and the XF10 $499, making the XF10 the more affordable of the two.
On paper the X100T is the stronger body of the two. It gives you a hybrid optical/electronic viewfinder.
The XF10 isn't far behind. It hits back with 24.2 MP of resolution, face/eye-detection AF, and 4K/15p video, with a couple more edges beyond that.
So which one? If you want a hybrid optical/electronic viewfinder, get the X100T. If 24.2 MP of resolution is closer to what you actually need, the XF10 is the smarter buy. And the XF10 costs less — $499 at launch.
Where the X100T wins
- +a hybrid optical/electronic viewfinder
Where the XF10 wins
- +24.2 MP of resolution
- +face/eye-detection AF
- +4K/15p video
- +a lighter 279 g body
Who should buy the X100T or XF10?
Buy the X100T if…
Pick the X100T if a hybrid optical/electronic viewfinder matters to you. It is the better fit for buyers who already lean toward X100 handling. Read the full X100T review for the use-case-specific pros and cons.
Buy the XF10 if…
Pick the XF10 if 24.2 MP of resolution, face/eye-detection AF matters to you. It also launched cheaper at $499. It is the better fit for buyers who already lean toward XF10 handling. Read the full XF10 review for the use-case-specific pros and cons.
X100T vs XF10: pros and cons
| Fujifilm X100T | Fujifilm XF10 |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Pros and cons mirror the in-house X100T review and XF10 review.
X100T vs XF10: full specs
| Spec |  X100T2014 · $1,299 |  XF102018 · $499 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Release year | 2014 | 2018 |
| Launch price | $1,299 | $499 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Sensor & Image | ||
| Megapixels | 16.3 MP | 24.2 MP |
| Sensor generation | X-Trans II | Bayer |
| Processor | EXR Processor II | Unnamed Bayer engine |
| ISO range | 200–6400 | 200–12800 |
| Autofocus & Burst | ||
| AF points | 49 | 91 |
| Subject detection | none | face-eye |
| Burst (fps) | 6 | 6 |
| Video | ||
| Max video | 1080p 60p | 4K 15p |
| Codec | H.264 | H.264 |
| Log profile | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Stabilization | None | None |
| Viewfinder | Hybrid OVF/EVF (2.36M dot) | None |
| LCD | 3" fixed | 3" fixed touch |
| Weather sealed | No | No |
| Weight | 440 g | 279 g |
| Storage | ||
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Card types | SD UHS-I | SD UHS-I |
| Power | ||
| Battery | NP-95 | NP-95 |
| Battery life (CIPA) | 330 shots | 330 shots |
| Software | ||
| Film sims | 5 | 5 |
Highlighted cells are best in class between these two. Specs sourced from public Fujifilm product pages.
In-depth reviews
For the full long-form review of each camera, see the Fujifilm X100T review and the Fujifilm XF10 review. Each one carries the full spec breakdown, pros and cons, and where this body sits in the current Fujifilm lineup.